Search for: "People v. Read (1983)"
Results 41 - 60
of 745
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Brady's first exposure to Supreme Court cases was reading ones with a direct impact on his life—especially United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
We will also provide an anonymous reader poll to learn more about what frequency and type of content people prefer to receive. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:15 am
The majority rejected that argument, saying it would require the court to overturn decades of precedents and to rewrite the plain text of Section 1983 to read “laws (unless those laws rest on the Spending Power). [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Finally, the majority concluded that it should construe the ADA to cover gender dysphoria to “avoid a serious constitutional question” that would result if the ADA were read to “discriminate against transgender people as a class, implicating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:31 am
But if Maine v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
” From 1983-2002, seven non-O157 STEC outbreaks were reported in the United States. [55] During the following five-year period from 2003-2007, CDC documented an additional five non-O157 STEC outbreaks (CDC Outbreak Surveillance Data, http://www.cdc.gov/foodborneoutbreaks/outbreak_data.htm). [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm
In 1983, the day beca [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:58 pm
” [3] As one noted expert observed, summarizing the history of these bacteria and their significance for public health, Although L. monocytogenes was recognized as an animal pathogen over 80 years ago, the first outbreak confirming an indirect transmission from animals to humans was reported only in 1983, in Canada’s Maritime provinces. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
19 May 2023, 11:37 am
, Marcavage v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:54 am
Welch, a well known 1983 opinion from the U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:36 am
Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:28 am
United States, 461 U.S. 574, 604 n.30 (1983); McGowan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 6:08 am
Dec. 211 (1983). [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
The Texas-based corporate creators of the "Read a Million Words Campaign" are extremely touchy about their intellectual property. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
In chapters on how juries and judges decide Section 1983 disputes, Schwartz shows that relatively few cases (under 7%) go to trial, adding that “federal juries. . .disproportionately exclude people of color, poor people, people with criminal records, and people who have had negative experiences with the police. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
., the plausibility requirement for complaints under Iqbal v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Welch, a 1983 case that has been used as a legal framework for determining secondary liability. [read post]
