Search for: "People v. Read (1983)"
Results 61 - 80
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2022, 8:13 am
” The Court found that there could be no legitimate reason for Congress to exclude transgender people who suffer from gender dysphoria from the ADA’s protection, and thus read the ADA to protect people who experience gender dysphoria in order to avoid that Constitutional issue. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
§1983 (“section 1983”),[4] and, for that matter, the Fourteenth Amendment’s “state action” requirement.[5] The Court framed the issue before it as a choice between two competing standards. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
In February 2009, S was convicted in Reading Crown Court for violent offences committed during an unprovoked attack on four people in September 2006. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
Romania, no. 42250/02, 1 July 2008 and Frodl v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
R (D and M) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; R (EM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 18 Read judgment With apologies, this post originally appeared with the wrong title The Court of Appeal has ruled on two linked challenges to the entitlement to welfare benefits of prisoners detained in psychiatric hospitals. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:10 pm
Const. 1983, Art. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:08 am
Moore v British Waterways Board [2012] EWHC 182 (Ch) – read judgment From time to time, the courts are called upon to explain who holds the power to order people about, and why they have it. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm
As background for Professor McMahon’s observations, it would be helpful to read Dan Trevas’ excellent preview of the case for Court News Ohio here. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 11:54 pm
The Bottom Line While the Ninth Circuit has touted the value of expert witnesses in several of its recent (albeit unpublished) opinions, Yonay v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
Despite this ruling the UK government has not yet amended the offending provisions of s.3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 2:00 pm
Wheeler 67 NY2d 960 and People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:37 am
Held v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:55 pm
Like its sister circuits, the Seventh Circuit read the Supreme Court’s language in Wyatt v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Anyway, I may be one of the few people anxiously downloading the transcript when this one is over. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm
Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Ltd [2014] UKSC 57 I will admit to being a bit cool on static caravan parks. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
In McDonald v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 2:26 pm
(Supreme Court 2020) The question in this case is whether the Federal Reserve Banks are people. [read post]
