Search for: "People v. Read (1983)" Results 81 - 100 of 745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[13] Another court refused to read a business-interests exception into Louisiana's facially categorical ban on firing for political activity. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am by Josh Blackman
For the reasons Judge Pryor identified, Kagan's reading of Section 1983 would run into the anti-commandeering principle. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
 Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
  The person most recently tried for contempt of Congress was Rita Lavelle in 1983. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am by John Elwood
Unfortunately for Grzegorczyk (but fortunately for a half-dozen other people), they were federal agents. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  When opposing counsel, Charles Chockley, asked the plaintiff, Benjamin Sipes, "Can you tell from looking at these people whether they are colored people or white people? [read post]