Search for: "People v. Read (1983)" Results 161 - 180 of 745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2014, 8:34 pm by Cindy Cohn
You can read the complete set of posts at: https://necessaryandproportionate.org/anniversary. [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:06 am by Rosalind English
No one can doubt that the “fundamental human dignity” of often elderly people held in such a predicament has been severely compromised. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:32 am by SHG
There may be no sign over the Chittenden Regional Correctional Facility in Vermont, but for pre-trial detainees, a sign might have read "arbeit macht frei," according to the Second Circuit in McGarry v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:50 pm by Brent Wieand
Supreme Court has many people questioning the impact that the court’s conservative majority will have on the pending docket. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:09 pm
So imagine my glee upon reading the (sadly unpublished) opinion in Miller v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:15 am by Marcia Coyle
The majority rejected that argument, saying it would require the court to overturn decades of precedents and to rewrite the plain text of Section 1983 to read “laws (unless those laws rest on the Spending Power). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:38 am by Heidi Kitrosser
One of my first thoughts upon reading yesterday’s decision in Lozman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am by John Elwood
Most people who read Relist Watch — that is, about three of our five current readers — do so because it functions as a preview of future cert grants. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:37 am by Sasha Volokh
Today, I'll talk about the second case that people often rely on when they want to argue that there's a rule against private delegations: Carter v. [read post]