Search for: "People v. Reagan"
Results 21 - 40
of 621
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
After serving in the Reagan Administration, Judge Buckley was nominated to the D.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
Quoting its 1978 opinion in TVA v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
In Department of Education v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From Project Veritas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
That allowed O'Connor, also an appointee of Ronald Reagan, to avoid casting a vote to outright reverse her Bowers v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
Instances might be cited, in which a conduct of this kind has saved the people from very fatal consequences of their own mistakes …. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
President Reagan's nomination of Robert Bork (an avowed originalist) was one key moment--with his defeat by the Democrats was seen as a political rejection of originalism. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:28 am
L v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm
[1] Stephenson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Then in City of Austin v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
Pereira v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
While there, she gained fame for “saving” Major League Baseball with her strike-ending decision in Silverman v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
See, e.g., the Fourth Circuit's recent opinion in PETA v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
Do we have people thinking about how to sue Fox News, pundits, and political candidates for their lies? [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:36 am
He was joined by Reagan-appointee Judge Edith Jones and Judge James Ho, another Trump appointee who also wrote a concurrence. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
This part of the project discusses why the “difficulty” of constitutional amendment under Article V matters. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
The history of price regulation was noted briefly by the Supreme Court in Munn v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm
The Supreme Court's ruling in City of Austin v. [read post]