Search for: "People v. Reed (1998)"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2021, 7:58 am
(Austin, Texas) Prosecutors at Rodney Reed’s 1998 trial illegally concealed statements from Stacy Stites’s co-workers showing that Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:09 am
Today, in Reed v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Reed’s defense prior to his 1998 trial. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 2:02 pm
Reed was indicted and convicted of capital murder in the Stites case and was sentenced to death in May 1998. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 1:12 am
Ms Reed deals head on with the Human Rights Act 1998 and the fact that this brings the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law and draws attention to Article 6 (right to a fair trial), Article 8 (right to private and Family Life), Article 10 (right to freedom of expression) and Article 14 (right to freedom from discrimination) as being those which most often arise in Family Courts. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
Lord Reed is the President of the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am
The rubric is the warning that traditionally appears at the top of a judgment telling people what they can and can’t do with it. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
Patrick Collins, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
Background The Supreme Court has upheld a challenge to the “named person” provisions of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Reed, 257 N.C. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In a media release, the penal reform charity notes that in its experience of working in prisons, carrying out research and representing young people in custody, “segregating vulnerable and disturbed people tends to make their problems worse”. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
Jack Gilbert, Lead Litigation Counsel for Facebook, explained that Facebook generally takes a neutral position on applications to identify people behind pages or profiles on their network. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
Its democratic mandate to make laws for the people of Scotland is beyond question”; and Lord Reed similarly noted that “(w)ithin the limits set by section 29(2) . . . [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:01 pm
View the article here Mukasey v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
See Reed v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
NGN is entitled to publish articles criticising people in the public eye. [read post]
