Search for: "People v. Regules fn. 1" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm by Employment Lawyers
   See Department of Justice Order 1200.1, Chapter 4-1, B.7.j, found at http://www.justice.gov/jmd/ps/chpt4-1.html (last accessed on March 30, 2012). [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm
Roberts, 730 F.3d 368, 385 (4th Cir. 2013) (Op., fn. 1, p. 7)). [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
For example, 130 people (out of 1.2-1.5 million) opted into the price-fixing case against JJB Sports concerning replica football shirts.[13] Likewise, barely 10,000 out of about 100,000 of Morrison’s employees joined the group action against the supermarket chain for unlawful disclosure of private data on the internet by another employee.[14] Furthermore, s.47C (2) of the Competition Act obviates the need for individual assessment of damages, but limits the requirement to prove… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
On appeal, the DMV contends (1) the trial court erred by concluding the officer's [***2] observation of Manriquez did not comply with the regulation; and (2) even if the officer did not comply, Manriquez did not establish the violation resulted in an inaccurate test result. 1 Regulation 1219.3 provides: "A breath sample shall be expired breath which is essentially alveolar in composition. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am by Dan Carvajal
This standard is used for economic regulations and all other classifications not subject to intermediate or strict scrutiny [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The trial, which took place one year later, culminated in acquittals of the four officers who were charged,[1] in reaction to which thousands of people took part in five days of civil disturbances known variously as the LA Uprising or the LA riots of 1992. [read post]