Search for: "People v. Rick"
Results 21 - 40
of 753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
So I guess that leaves room for people that have different…more than one relationship going on. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:24 am
Astley v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:10 pm
Over at Bench Memos, Rick Garnett makes two points about the effect of a potential Obama Presidency on abortion politics that push in opposite directions.On the one hand, Rick argues that pro-life advocates (and in particular Doug Kmiec) should not support Obama because it is important to overturn Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
This past week, Governor Rick Snyder issued an executive order appointing 10 people to serve on an "advisory commission". [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:49 am
This past week, Governor Rick Snyder issued an executive order appointing 10 people to serve on an "advisory commission". [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
The problem is less Rick Perry per se than it is the constituency to which he genuflects. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
Even better, in my uninformed view, than the movie, which starred Rick Schroeder, Freddy Prinze Jr. and Henry Winkler.) [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:44 pm
The Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:25 am
Source: Albany Time UnionIn its decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 85 U. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 12:23 pm
Updating this ILB entry from August 18th, referencing the August 15th Court of Appeals ruling in the case of Rick Cook & Daniel Funk v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 8:03 am
And of course in Bluman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm
It is sometimes suggested that the Supreme Court’s 1920 decision in Missouri v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:02 pm
– Fieger v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm
Some people who have been reading this blog know that I have been waiting for the decision in Evans v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:49 am
Briefly: In an op-ed for The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Rick Hasen suggests that a “special jurisdictional provision” in the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance law “makes it much more likely that within the next few years the Supreme Court will strike limits on the amounts people and entities can contribute to the political parties in so-called party soft money. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:46 pm
ESN v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:12 pm
Rick Bickhram: Now Dave, under the provisions of Part V of the SLRA, the magic words are 'dependant'. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:01 pm
As you may recall, FutureLawyer (Rick Georges) and The Mac Lawyer (Ben Stevens) went head-to-head in the March 2008 ABA Journal (Mac v. [read post]
