Search for: "People v. Roberts (1982)" Results 121 - 140 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2022, 9:04 pm by Katherine McKeen
” Although all four of these justices seemed skeptical of Ramirez’s argument, Justices Alito, Roberts, and Thomas joined the majority in Burwell v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm by Amy Howe
” And more broadly, Roberts expressed concern about whether dismissing the case would allow plaintiffs to “moot a case to manipulate the jurisdiction of this Court,” “particularly when you have a program of litigation like this around the country by people who may or may not have standing. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
The only example Koppelman cites for originalism having influenced a case outcome the Natelson-Kopel influence on Chief Justice Roberts' opinion in the Obamacare case, National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  First, I did not posit Gary Lawson, Robert Bork, or Edwin Meese as the dependent variables in this book. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:35 am by Eugene Volokh
It has been illegal for about a year, however, for Robert Serafinowicz to “Post[] any information, whether adverse or otherwise, pertaining to [Bernstein] on any website for any purpose. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
Supreme Court, voting 5-4 along ideological lines, has ruled that strip-searches of people arrested for minor offenses does not violate the Fourth Amendment principle against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am by Matt Sundquist
”  And in 1982, in Globe Newspaper Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The judge wrote in December 2008 that the Seventh Circuit Court, whose decisions he must follow, had ruled on the issue in 1982 in Quilici v. [read post]