Search for: "People v. Robinson (1994)"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[This decision was made under the “old” Section 3020-a that was in effect prior to a revision in 1994.]The Appellate Division said it would apply Pell standard to determine whether the penalty is too lenient. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[This decision was made under the “old” Section 3020-a that was in effect prior to a revision in 1994.]The Appellate Division said it would apply Pell standard to determine whether the penalty is too lenient. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
In Blanch v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:33 pm
Gilleo (1994).) [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” At Bloomberg BNA, Kimberly Robinson takes a look at last week’s argument in Manuel v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
” 735 ILCS 5/12-107 This prohibition on imprisoning people for mere debt does not ring true in an Illinois divorce court. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Acuff-Rose, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), which held that an alleged rap parody of the popular song Pretty Woman could qualify as a parody protected by the copyright fair use doctrine. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Sweet Justice (1994-1995). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Robinson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
I will now discuss the Wuhan (Liu Li v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:33 am
Robinson told the defendant of the withdrawal and that the defendant then arranged with his brother to rob Price. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:27 am
The Feb. 3, 2020 decisions seem to follow well from the logic of the Supreme Court's 1994 Pretty Woman case (Campbell v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
The people sent us a clear message. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
The answer is complicated but likely lies in the present (thin) state of research on these issues, but also common conceptions, and misconceptions, about surveillance and impact on people and broader society. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
