Search for: "People v. Rodriguez (1998)"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2023, 10:15 am
From People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
(People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Hart v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 8:16 pm
Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990). [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 8:16 pm
Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990). [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 6:14 pm
Ponce Plaza Associates, 723 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1998) and Harry Rich Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:56 pm
Contrast Sawyer with the Michigan Supreme Court's decision from this May in People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:54 am
Sudan, a case that stems from the 1998 attacks by al Qaeda on the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, which killed over 200 people and injured over 1,000 more. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
McAllen Hospitals, L.P. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
That allocative choice was reasonable in 1998, and it remains reasonable in 2016. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
That allocative choice was reasonable in 1998, and it remains reasonable in 2016. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:00 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in another case this year, Buck v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 5:28 am
” Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Rodriguez Dod Toward Justice: Michael A. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:20 am
Sandoz and Sandoz v. [read post]