Search for: "People v. Rogers (1988)"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Also helps explain 1962 expansion of confusion; 1988 constru [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Townsley, 843 F.2d 1070, 1073–75 (8th Cir. 1988); • fail to count votes and to alter votes counted, Ryan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
In doing so, he actually hurt many people. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Cases such as R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, R v Jacquard, 1997 CanLII 374 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 314, and R v More, 1963 CanLII 805 (MBCA) have helped us establish notions of what “planned and deliberate” murder entails. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:19 pm
From Miller v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
Just as I paid no attention to a variety of other cases that were launched in hopes of eventually getting a cert. grant, such as Rogers v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:00 am
Schlunk, 486 U.S. 694 (1988). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am
A few examples: Trump repurposed money to build the Mexican border wall even after Congress had denied funding for that project; he publicly dangled presidential pardons or commutations and later delivered them—to Roger Stone, Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn—in an attempt to deter their cooperation with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation; he hounded the Senate-confirmed attorney general out of office and replaced him with a manifestly unqualified subordinate on… [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:38 am
McCollum v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
As a result, through the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1988 (FVRA), Congress provided general authority enabling the president to temporarily fill vacancies in high-level federal government positions. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm
The First Exploration Fund 1987 (1988), 25 B.C.L.R. (2d) 377 (S.C.); Rolling v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm
The First Exploration Fund 1987 (1988), 25 B.C.L.R. (2d) 377 (S.C.); Rolling v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm
The First Exploration Fund 1987 (1988), 25 B.C.L.R. (2d) 377 (S.C.); Rolling v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
Hours later, President-Elect Trump tweeted, ‘Great move on delay (by V. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
… Major Philosophers rarely or never cited Heraclitus, Parmenides, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Protagoras, Epicurus, Zeno of Citium, Plotinus, Epictetus, Gregory the Great, John the Scot, Avicenna, Averroes, Roger Bacon, John Calvin, Baruch Spinoza, George Berkeley, Henri Bergson, Alfred North Whitehead and Søren Kierkegaard, all named in that earlier list of major philosophers, fill that bill. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 5:45 pm
Rogers Communications Inc., which followed the decision in B & W Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
