Search for: "People v. Roman" Results 81 - 100 of 642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am by Matt Cameron
It bears repeating that the Bill of Rights was designed not to protect the government, but the people that the government is supposed to serve. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
 Yeah, I may prefer briefs that are double spaced and in Times New Roman font. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:23 am by Ted Folkman
I’d like to recall one of the cases she decided during my term as clerk: Roman v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm by Giles Peaker
Milton Laines Roman (R OAO) v London Borough of Southwark (2022) EWHC 1232 (Admin) This was a judicial review of LB Southwark’s refusal to place the claimant in Band 1 of its Allocation Scheme, on the basis that the claimant’s current overcrowding in a private tenancy was a ‘deliberate act’. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:24 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  The passage suggesting that the corporation itself has rights relied upon a citation to the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
The winner of my request for the Llewellyn-like opinion about stopping people is smcelhaney, who pointed me to Judge Pratt's dissent in the 2nd Circuit case of United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 9:22 am by Venkat
(Apparently traced back to Aristotle, Roman law, and Justinian’s code.) [read post]