Search for: "People v. Romero (1984)"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 2:30 am
Blackhorse v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
At sentencing, counsel filed a motion under People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:16 pm
The Court noted that it had previously "construed CPL 470.15 (1) as a legislative restriction on the Appellate Division's power to review issues either decidhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifed in an appellant's favor, or not ruled upon, by the trial court," citing People v Romero (91 NY2d 750, 753-753 [1998]) and People v Goodfriend (64 NY2d 695, 697-698 [1984]) (92 NY2d at 474). [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:35 pm
Cheek v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 5:53 pm
United States, 466 U.S. 170,180 (1984)); see also United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
ROMERO’S DAWN OF THE DEAD. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
S. 256, 259 (1979) ("Admiralty law is judge-made law to a great extent"); Romero v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
And allow me to venture a guess or two… you guys at Chase are “overwhelmed” with requests for loan modifications… you’re busy… friends came in unexpectedly from out of town… you just can’t hire people to meet the demand… or wait… I know… Mr. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
