Search for: "People v. Root" Results 41 - 60 of 2,284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
By Sophia Williams “We’ve filed a lawsuit challenging AI image generators for using artists’ work without consent, credit, or compensation. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Edward A. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
McReynolds defended unenumerated rights of property and contract—which he believed were rooted in morality as well as history and tradition— as a bulwark against the intrusions of the nascent administrative state. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
Supreme Court had finally weighed in and the Indigenous people of Washington had won yet again.Charles Wilkinson was a legal scholar and advocate for Indigenous peoples. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 2:57 am by Frank Cranmer
Churches up and down the country are involved in caring for vulnerable people from all backgrounds. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am by centerforartlaw
The “whitewashed” antiquities would then re-enter the market of Mainland China or circulate in foreign markets.[17] China’s Legal Framework for Cultural Property Protection, Auction, and Restitution The cornerstone of China’s cultural property law is the 1982 Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Cultural Relics (​​“1982 LPCR”). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]