Search for: "People v. Roth" Results 141 - 160 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 1:44 pm by Ken White
S. 105, 127 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment)–including obscenity, Roth v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
It gets worse when you factor in the various other benefits that are eliminated when you file separately including: (i) child and dependent care tax credit; (ii) Roth IRA contributions; (iii) traditional IRA contributions; (iv) deduction of net capital losses; (v) student loan interest deduction; and (vi) deduction of college tuition expenses (and there are more). [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am by Jan von Hein
Roth: Rule and exceptions regarding the review of the European Order of Payment in exceptional cases according to art.20 par. 2 of Reg. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am by Jennifer González
However, the precise definition of obscenity was unclear, and the Supreme Court would not rule that obscenity was not constitutionally protected speech until Roth v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
Other people (not me) espouse what I refer to as "cost plus" reasoning. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:11 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:16 am by Kevin Kaufman
Step-up in basis discourages people from realizing capital gains. [read post]