Search for: "People v. Sabell"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2012, 9:27 pm
This is in turn forced me to consider why would it be useful, for example, to discuss or even mention the Apple V Samsung global IP battle or the Laboutin appeal decision or the latest decisions on the Harmonisation Directive? [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
In this regard, the average consumer normally perceives a mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyze its various details (OHIM v Shaker, C‑334/05 P).In considering such distinctive and dominant elements, the Court noted that the figures in both marks are likely to represent strong or healthy people. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV, at 17; Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma at 18-19). [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:15 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
While the list will close at midnight on 31 October, the IPKat can tell you that the five front-runners, in descending order, are Sabel v Puma, Canon, Baby-Dry, Lloyd and Silhouette. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:57 pm
Afro Leo agrees with this judgement:The reality is that more and more people do check and question their diagnosis and prescription on the Internet for instance - in fact, a common complaint from doctors. [read post]
