Search for: "People v. Sago" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
GC excludes likelihood of confusion between marks representing stylized human figure and relating to same goods due to low distinctiveness of shared concept
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
In this regard, the average consumer normally perceives a mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyze its various details (OHIM v Shaker, C‑334/05 P).In considering such distinctive and dominant elements, the Court noted that the figures in both marks are likely to represent strong or healthy people. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
With Intent to Annoy!
9 Jan 2006, 4:42 pm
In 1973, the Supreme Court attempted to define obscenity in Miller v. [read post]
The First: First Amendment Project's Weblog - http://www.thefirstamendment.org/blog/