Search for: "People v. Sandoval (2001)"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001), tightened the screws. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:13 am
People v Carlos Diaz, 2 No. 136, 2001 NY Int. 127, (2001); witness in Mexico and People claimed unavailable. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:11 pm
Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001) and Olmsted v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
(People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:20 pm
" Cardona-Sandoval, 6 F.3d at 23 (internal footnotes omitted). [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:41 am
Sandoval 532 U.S. 275 (2001), the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:21 am
Sandoval (2001) the Court indicated that these “implied” causes of action are disfavored and that the judgment of who can sue to enforce violations of federal statutes belongs to Congress. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
Sandoval,34 N.Y.2d 371, 357 N.Y.S.2d 849, 314 N.E.2d 413 (1974), and evidence-in-chief of prior [30 Misc.3d 966] bad acts, People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:33 am
First, “the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
It does not actually put people on notice that it prohibits such advertisements. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:34 am
Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001). [read post]
