Search for: "People v. Santiago"
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2008, 1:35 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:04 am
Until State v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:27 am
Ashcroft that, under the relevant federal statute, DUI convictions do not provide grounds for the removal of people like Palomar-Santiago. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:03 pm
On this point, Palomar-Santiago’s attorney sought to limit the primary case cited by the government, Yakus v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:27 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act, active efforts)Santiago v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
Legalnewsline.com reports that the suit, The People of California v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
Taking its decision in People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
We therefore substitute our own discretion, " even in the absence of an abuse [of discretion],' " and we modify the order by determining that defendant is a level two risk (People v Smith, 30 AD3d 1070, 1071, quoting Matter of Von Bulow, 63 NY2d 221, 224; see People v Brewer, 63 AD3d 1604). [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 10:23 am
The case is Santiago v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:04 am
Circuit — Tuaua v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
Seemingly in Palomar-Santiago’s favor, federal courts – including the Supreme Court in its 2004 decision in Leocal v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 1:19 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com People, respondent v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:56 pm
"(People v Santiago, 22 NY3d 740, 754 [2014] [Rivera, J., dissenting]). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Palomar-Santiago, 141 S. [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:21 pm
"Rumpole: "And this applies to people convicted pre-trial? [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:19 am
In People v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:31 pm
See Santiago-Godinez, 12 F.3d at 728. [read post]
