Search for: "People v. Score"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
There's only 1 mention, at p. 66, of Johnson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Several justices in previous cases, such as Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
” With its decision in Hall v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
Huston, Case No. 138287, so the Court of Appeals could consider a challenge to the scoring of Offense Variable 10, MCL § 77.40, in light of People v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:08 pm
& Burberry Group, PLC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
Rather, we ask ourselves only whether there could possibly be some potential reason for the disparate treatment of the two classes: a group of prison guards, singled out for lesser punishment, and a group of prisoners singled out for more.And, on that score, I gotta say, yeah, there's an argument. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 6:16 pm
People are uploading video by the scores, and they'll need to be able to find what they like. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:36 am
In the Supreme Court case Grutter v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:25 am
I believe the FTC is going to score at least a partial victory over Qualcomm and that Apple is going to lose the App Store case (not referring to the case as a whole, just to the question before the Supreme Court), and then it will depend on the reasoning (the Supreme Court may decide Apple v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:52 am
In Hesseltine v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
"* The rule of three was held lawful by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 2:45 pm
Supreme Court: Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:57 am
People v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:17 pm
As people probably know by now, today a three-judge panel struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:00 pm
The case is al-Kidd v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am
The opposite of that bias are people who believe that businesses profit off of human misery and lawsuits are just the best means for class-based score settling. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 8:31 pm
In People v Bonilla-Machado, No. 140510, the Michigan Supreme Court addressed three issues on appeal, reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals in part, and remanded for resentencing. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am
MCL 777.31” The Court again considered the applications in People v Corrin and People v Miller, which were held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Smith, which was decided this past December. [read post]