Search for: "People v. Score" Results 61 - 80 of 1,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2023, 5:13 pm by Tom Smith
Until last night – when two people were indicted in Florida for acts of vandalism – no arrests have been made in any of the scores of similar attacks that have damaged other crisis pregnancy counseling offices and churches coast to coast since word first leaked in late May that the Supreme Court would overturn Roe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
There's only 1 mention, at p. 66, of Johnson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
Huston, Case No. 138287, so the Court of Appeals could consider a challenge to the scoring of Offense Variable 10, MCL § 77.40, in light of People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
  Rather, we ask ourselves only whether there could possibly be some potential reason for the disparate treatment of the two classes:  a group of prison guards, singled out for lesser punishment, and a group of prisoners singled out for more.And, on that score, I gotta say, yeah, there's an argument. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 6:16 pm
  People are uploading video by the scores, and they'll need to be able to find what they like. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:40 am
The court ruled that aboriginal groups are entitled to prevent forestry in this particular tract.The unanimous 8-0 decision in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:25 am by Florian Mueller
I believe the FTC is going to score at least a partial victory over Qualcomm and that Apple is going to lose the App Store case (not referring to the case as a whole, just to the question before the Supreme Court), and then it will depend on the reasoning (the Supreme Court may decide Apple v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
"* The rule of three was held lawful by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Christopher Zorn
As people probably know by now, today a three-judge panel struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]