Search for: "People v. Scott (1983)"
Results 1 - 20
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2008, 9:24 pm
See Scott v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm
Township of Scott, an important Takings Clause property rights case. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:15 pm
He briefed the case of Scott v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
CA - PEOPLE v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) as one of the five worst [the others being: Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:42 pm
Scott Dodson, of the University of Arkansas writes a swell article on how the Supreme Court screwed up Bowles v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:05 pm
” [@ClarkHat on Twitter] “Kern County, a jurisdiction with a long unfortunate history of putting the wrong people in prison” [Radley Balko, Glenn Reynolds/USA Today on People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 6:51 am
Scott, 2007 PA Super 16, 2007 Pa. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 6:50 pm
Grace Land II, LLC v Bristol Township, 2019 WL 4752026 (ED PA 9/30/2019) [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 4:35 am
Scott’s “shift” is that Bivens and § 1983 suits name the police departments rather than the individual officers as parties, and that the departments, rather than the individual officers, be liable for any judgment. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:32 am
See Alden v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
Louis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:31 am
In Wednesday’s argument in Knick v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 7:57 am
Villamonte-Marquez, 462 U.S. 579, 584 n.3 (1983) (rejecting argument that search was unlawful because officers' intent in boarding vessel was other than that contemplated by statute which authorized officers to board to examine vessel's documentation); Scott v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:33 am
(Eugene Volokh) Haley v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
(Thanks to Sina Safvati, Daniel Simkin, and Sabine Tsuruda, the Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic students who worked on the brief.) [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 11:15 pm
That's a major reason for which I'm underwhelmed by Qualcomm's citation to a 1983 Second Circuit decision. [read post]
