Search for: "People v. Scott (1996)" Results 1 - 20 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2016, 10:17 am
On September 27, Kozinski's Favorite Flicks offers the 1996 biopic The People v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 1:03 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Tomorrow, the California Supreme Court will release its decision in People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Starting in July 1996, Stanley Scott lived in Greensboro Properties’ low-income housing development apartment complex. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:20 am by CJLF Staff
  Though this practice has been very common during jury selection, in its 1995 ruling, State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 12:59 pm
The Kansas court is now considering the appeal of Scott, sentenced to die by injection for the shootings of Doug and Beth Brittain as they lay in bed in their rural Goddard farmhouse in September 1996. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:39 am
Co., 224 AD2d 205 (1st Dept. 1996); Argo Corp. v Greater NY Ins. , supra.The court also granted the agent's motion for summary judgment, finding that there was not contract or legal relationship between the plaintiff and Nova's agent. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am by David Oscar Markus
” As our country’s experience with stop-and-frisk vividly demonstrates, however, for police, reasonable suspicion is too often synonymous with being a Black or brown person in public.The practice of racially profiling Black drivers was effectively endorsed by the Court in the 1996 ruling in Whren v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm by Giles Peaker
See generally the non-exhaustive list of factors set out in the judgment of Scott Baker J in R (Khan) v London Borough of Newham [2001] EWHC Admin 589 at paragraphs 8 to 14. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Thus, Gravano's and Lohan's claims that Take-Two impermissibly used their likeness in Grand Theft Auto V, or in material promoting Grand Theft Auto V, must fail. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Scott Skinner-Thompson and Kate Levine argue that even after Bostock v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am by Geoffrey
Bremer GmbH v. ets Soules et Cie and Anthony G Scott [1985] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 160 Disputes arose in connection with Bremer’s sale of US soya bean meal to Soules. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm by Giles Peaker
Imam, R (On the Application Of) v The London Borough of Croydon (2021) EWHC 739 (Admin) This is the judgment in a judicial review claim seeking a declaration that Croydon was in breach of its statutory duty under section 193(2) of the Housing Act 1996 to provide suitable accommodation, and for mandatory relief, that Croydon provide suitable accommodation, and consider the claimant’s application for band 1 housing priority. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
(Thanks to Sina Safvati, Daniel Simkin, and Sabine Tsuruda, the Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic students who worked on the brief.) [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Julie Hilden
Supreme Court recently declined to grant review in the very interesting case of Saint John’s Church in the Wilderness v. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 3:29 pm
Take for example the 1996 US Supreme Court case which proclaimed that civil forfeitures were not punishment for double jeopardy purposes often cited as U.S. v. [read post]