Search for: "People v. Scott (1999)" Results 21 - 40 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
" But a rather angry sounding PRCA rejected the offer and accused the CLA of "downplaying" the issue by limiting the people who could attend. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:48 am by Jeff Gamso
So he's surprised and disappointed that it's come to this.USA v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am by David Markus
Scott, 177 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 1999), and subsequently left undecided in Gilbert v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:53 am by Scott Bomboy
In his majority opinion in National Labor Relations Board V. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
In an April 27, 2010 post titled, `The Dog Grifters: Donna Roberts and Dawn Abrams Strike Again,’ defendant wondered how `these despicable human beings’ `think that they can continue to get away with ripping people off . . . [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:26 am by Jeff Gamso
In 1999, without a lawyer, he filed a petition seeking his release. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People… [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Henrichsen, Henrichsen Law Group, PLLC, Jacksonville, FL, Victoria Blanche Kroell, Cole Scott & Kissane, PA, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
Surdonja (1999) 31 HLR 686 and R v Hillingdon LBC ex p. [read post]