Search for: "People v. Scott (2002)" Results 1 - 20 of 199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
“It was no country for sissies, then or now,” O’Connor wrote in Lazy B, the 2002 memoir about life on the ranch that she co-authored with her brother, Alan Day. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
" Scott Pelley at CBS News declared that "the AR-15's high velocity ammo is the fear of every American emergency room. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But it should be fairly reliable, and should thus diminish the damage that the AI program may do to people's reputations. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
That conclusion had “the effect of completely overturning the reasoning of the Court of Appeal [in Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45; [2002] Fam 261] which carved out an exception to the general rule concerning the reportability of proceedings heard in private”: Xanthopoulos at [116]. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Williams: Type of police questioning beyond routine interrogation also triggers the right to counsel. 1979 Scott v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Having said that, however, the time and effort expended to date are sunk costs.[12] Granted, many people are not very good at ignoring sunk costs.[13] Ignoring sunk costs, however, is precisely what rational decision makers – including the ALI – ought to do.[14] The basic problem with the proposed Restatement of the Law of Corporate Governance is that corporate law is not a suitable subject for being restated. [read post]