Search for: "People v. Self (1998)" Results 1 - 20 of 473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm by Ryan Scoville
This case drew a lot of attention from people who care about U.S. foreign relations law because Bond’s second argument asked the Court to overrule Missouri v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:17 pm by Simon Gibbs
Lord Justice Henry's held in Bailey v IBC Vehicles [1998] EWCA Civ 566 that: “The signature of the bill of costs under the Rules is effectively the certificate by an officer of the Court that the receiving party’s solicitors are not seeking to recover in relation to any item more than they have agreed to charge their client under a contentious business agreement. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
The laboratory has operated since 1998, generating a great body of data, which has been closely scrutinized. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am by David Kopel
Colorado's path to statehood is the story how a radically free and independent people have exercised their sovereign right of self-government. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(Note there is some oversimplification below; for instance, the rules are different when the defender is actually the initial aggressor, for instance if D attacks V, V fights back, and then D kills V in “self-defense. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Google has won its appeal in the Supreme Court in Lloyd v Google, with a unanimous judgement that rejected the Court of Appeal’s ruling that compensation can be awarded for “loss of control” of personal data by reason of any non-trivial contravention of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998), without the need to prove facts relating to specific individuals. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:19 pm by David Kopel
“Actual use in self-defense is a poor measure of whether a particular firearm is ‘typically possessed by law-abiding citizens’ for self-defense, as it is unlikely most people will ever need to actually discharge a firearm in self-defense. [read post]