Search for: "People v. Sewell"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:14 am
In 1990, he raped Mrs B after they had been out evangelising together and in 2014 he was convicted of her rape and of indecently assaulting two other people. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am
Mr Sewell was convicted of her rape and of indecently assaulting two other people in 2014. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
July 6, 2020) People v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Han and Tia Sewell shared a Justice Department motion in opposition to a petition for a writ of habeas corpus regarding the transfer of Guantánamo detainee Majid Khan. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:57 pm
Tia Sewell shared a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on behalf of Majid S. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 12:11 pm
Rubenstein analyzed the implications of the Texas v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
Tia Sewell explained how the Trump-appointed CEO of the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:59 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the latest news in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
Its domineering chairman and CEO, Sewell L. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
An Empirical Observation and Analysis of the Effects of the Serious Harm Requirement in Section 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013, Charlie Sewell, Inde [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 11:04 am
New 2018 Case: Sewell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:47 am
Linda Sewell et al., 05-16-01011-CV. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:47 am
Linda Sewell et al., 05-16-01011-CV. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
In today’s case (Thompson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
14.53: Lord Keen QC is discussing the political nature of the Smith Commission in Scotland that led to the Scotland Act and its interaction with the Sewel Convention. 14.46: Lord Keen QC names section 28.8 of the Sewel Convention as the language of “political judgement”. [read post]
