Search for: "People v. Sharpe"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 5:55 am
What is fixed cannot be altered except through Article V amendment; and3. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal (with the Chancellor giving the only substantive judgment), granting him permission to serve out. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:27 am
Some excellent law review articles tackle the social construction of rape, such as Jeannie Suk’s detailed account of State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
Back to Jones v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:07 am
I'm in a stretch where blogging time is limited, and I will have more to say about this case and this transcript later, but as the audience for this blog includes a lot of really sharp people who like to read and interpret documents for themselves, I want to put this out in the public domain. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 12:31 pm
Citizens v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 11:09 am
Conti cites to a February 2015 pretrial decision in Zenith Electronics, LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:32 am
Shavelson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:54 am
Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in Halliburton v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:32 pm
The loss of that thing will potentially make people less happy. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:38 am
But 230 defendants routinely extract pieces of a third-party submission–sometimes as promotional previews, sometimes to fit publication constraints. 230(c)(1) has applied in so many cases fitting that paradigm (People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:22 am
Lynch (10th Cir. 2015) and Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 8:09 am
People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 9:48 am
The court doesn’t address whether people reading Twitter on their mobile devices could have seen different emoji depictions substituted in by their device’s operating system. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm
Those people tend to like to argue. [read post]
