Search for: "People v. Shepherd"
Results 141 - 160
of 180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2013, 6:54 am
Her public employer did not need for her testimony to be actually impeached at a hearing in order to show that her comments created a substantial disruption in the workplace (Shepherd v McGee, November 7, 2013, Hernandez, M). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:55 am
See People v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
Read on and find out......Kuvin v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:21 pm
Tecmed v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 4:41 pm
These are questions that people in England and Wales should give consideration to in taking stock of s 1 of their Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
Jay Shepherd has run the Boston management-side employment-law boutique Shepherd Law Group for the past 13 years. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
Jay Shepherd has run the Boston management-side employment-law boutique Shepherd Law Group for the past 13 years. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
(Christian Shepherd, "Looking to the Future: Xi Shuts the Door on the Past," The Washington Post (7 November 2021)("Only two previous leaders of China have previously adjudicated on party history: Mao Zedong, the founder of the People's Republic, and Deng Xiaoping, the strongman leader who unleashed market reforms in 1978. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
They add that "a search for belonging, purpose, adventure, and friendship, appear to remain the main reasons for people to join the Islamic State. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
I will be writing more about the UCC Article 3 v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am
The government’s long-awaited proposal for addressing cross-border data requests, in the form of draft legislation, is finally here. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
In the matter of Paper v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(As an aside at this point, notice how the word "Community" is used in section (g): as most people would understand it. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm
Justice Robert Jackson famously described the Act four years later in the case of Wang Yang Sung v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
This week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm
These originalists maintain that the Privileges or Immunities Clause was a free standing provision, the substance of which included both the “Corfield v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
" See also Brown v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
