Search for: "People v. Shields (1991)" Results 1 - 20 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[24]  The court continued by observing that: [H]ere, the Provision is used by an agency of the federal government to shield itself from public view. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
(Nor does Missouri "official immunity" shield the officers from her state-law claims.) [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
  To my surprise, although a few people had written about it, see, e.g., Kenneth Duval, Burdens of Proof and Qualified Immunity, 37 S. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
  Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development February 4, 2022 At the invitation of President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir V. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:58 pm by Russell Knight
CO., 579 NE 2d 322 – Ill: Supreme Court 1991 It is not just attorney-client communication that is privileged. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]