Search for: "People v. Shock" Results 41 - 60 of 2,048
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm by Adam White
At its worst, unstable administration wrecks the rule of law and, eventually, people’s respect for government itself. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
She tweeted, amongst other things, that “South Africa has shown moral leadership in bringing its application to the ICJ under the Genocide Convention, to protect the Palestinian people in Gaza. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am by SHG
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:58 pm by Amy Howe
ShareIt has been nearly 40 years since the Supreme Court indicated in Chevron v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by Amy Howe
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:14 am by Joe Mullin
  Defending Alice The Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thirty years before Dobbs, the Supreme Court decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Barbara Pfeffer Billauer
Anaphylactic shock can result from merely sniffing an offending substance that is otherwise benign or even healthy. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
You cannot expect to utilise AI in your products or services without considering privacy, data protection and how you will safeguard people’s rights. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Until all people, Israelis and Palestinians, between the river and the sea, can live in peaceful liberty. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 3:32 pm by Saira Hussain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a case that has serious implications for people’s First Amendment rights to engage in cross-border journalism and advocacy. [read post]