Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 201 - 220 of 3,853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 1:00 pm by Josh Blackman
"] On June 5, a Fifth Circuit panel (Smith, Higginson, and Willett) heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Two energy companies have also been fined £250,000 by the ICO for bombarding people and businesses on the ‘do not call register’ with unsolicited marketing calls. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:25 am by Florian Mueller
Apple FRAND determination by Mr Justice Marcus Smith (High Court of Justice, England and Wales) has been my most popular patent-related blog post in recent months. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith, Idaho's Law of Constitutional Interpretation: Lessons from Planned Parenthood Great Northwest v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The full 742 page, 2618 paragraph judgment, Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 41) [2023] FCA 555, was published  on 5 June 2023. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am by Daphne Keller
  The Supreme Court recognized risks of this kind in a 1959 obscenity prosecution against a bookseller, Smith v. [read post]