Search for: "People v. Smith (1983)" Results 1 - 20 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
Background In 1983, a jury convicted Frank Spisak of murdering three people. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:09 am by James Eckert
  Thus, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, a rational fact finder could conclude that defendant acquired the video and exercised control over it and the images (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]). [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
However, in coming to this ruling, Judge Leon distinguishes the 1979 decision, Smith v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" In Section 1983 litigation, suing people acting under color of law means suing them in their individual capacities. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
The 1983 trial became a public spectacle as Spisak celebrated his killings in court and openly discussed his hateful views. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
He was arrested in 1983 under the same name, again for arson. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
Ward dissent, which ignored the bright line between habeas and 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 that Scalia himself had drawn in Heck v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
 People v Whalen, 59 NY2d 273, 280-81 [1983].Similarly, a prosecutor may not create a false impression concerning evidence or facts. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm by David Smith
Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Ltd [2014] UKSC 57 I will admit to being a bit cool on static caravan parks. [read post]