Search for: "People v. Smith (1990)"
Results 1 - 20
of 389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm
Smith was decided 34 years ago today: April 17, 1990. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:13 am
Supporters argued that the theory had roots in Smith itself (specifically its explanation of the earlier Sherbert v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm
The SCOTUSblog case file for Smith v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Martin Act Claims Arising Out of Stock Spinning In the Late 1990s In 2006, the New York State Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 7:06 pm
Smith (1990) which rejected use of the "compelling interest" test to validate neutral regulations of general applicability that burden religious practices. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:10 am
The Supreme Court decided a case in 1990, Illinois v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:22 pm
Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Writing for the majority in the 1990 case of Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am
In 1990, in Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for… [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 6:37 am
Smith (1990), made it more difficult for plaintiffs to sue the government under the Free Exercise Clause. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:20 am
Days after the sixth episode of FX’s new documentary about The People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
Smith (1990), and mandating exemptions when, as appears to be the case in Washington, no strong reason exists for not giving religious pharmacists an exemption from the stocking and delivery rules. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:53 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 889 n.5 (1990). [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:18 am
Priscilla Smith(Priscilla Smith represented Dr. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
RFRA was a reaction to the 1990 case Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Affecting thousands of people every year.It also involves an important right. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:21 pm
(See also People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
Smith I’m sorry. [read post]
