Search for: "People v. Smith (1993)"
Results 21 - 40
of 292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm
Smith. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am
Jacobsen (4th Cir. 1993), for proceeding in a case pseudonymously. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Jacobsen (4th Cir. 1993), for proceeding in a case pseudonymously. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
City of Hialeah (1993). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
I relied in part on an anecdote involving a visit by Justice Scalia to the University of Texas and and his clear lack of interest in what his friend and former colleague Doug Laycock planned to publish in the Supreme Court Review about his opinion in the “peyote case,” Smith v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:09 am
Wainwright and Panetti v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
” Not only do people enter with full knowledge but there is no charge. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Jackson: Police questioning cannot occur after an attorney is requested. 1993 Godinez v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
”[13]And it is in no small part thanks to this work of repudiation that more people on the left as well as on the right now recognize the hollowness of liberalism’s pretensions to neutrality. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm
" In Smith v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 883–85 (1990), and re-establish the “balancing” test established by Sherbert v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:20 pm
Ridpath A, Reddy V, Layton M, et al. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"[17] [V.] [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:05 am
In Tandon v. [read post]
Why Carefully Designed Public Vaccination Mandates Can—and Should—Withstand Constitutional Challenge
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
And although there has been significant clamor among conservatives to overrule Smith (including three justices expressly endorsing such a move in June’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
