Search for: "People v. Smith (2001)"
Results 1 - 20
of 377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2020, 10:21 am
Sineneng-Smith was convicted under this law of bringing people to the United States under the false pretense that they were eligible for the “Labor Certification” program even though this program had expired in 2001. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:09 am
Today's Court of Appeals decision (People v Kent #70, 5/8/12) has two very important components. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:12 am
I don’t entirely agree with him — I’m one of the few people who thinks Buckley v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:16 pm
In view of the Fourth Amendment protection against warrantless searches, this practice was challenged in the case of Smith v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:16 pm
In view of the Fourth Amendment protection against warrantless searches, this practice was challenged in the case of Smith v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
Consider, for instance, the pen register decision (Smith v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:47 pm
People v Lane, 7 NY3d 888, 889 [2006]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266, 273 [2004]; People v Hines, 97 NY2d 56, 61-62 [2001]).People v Kolupa, __ NY3d __, 2009 NY Slip Op 06586 [September 22, 2009].Would you want to be the attorney calling Mr. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:36 pm
Greece [2001] 31 EHRR 15). [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:01 am
Some people like that. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Affecting thousands of people every year.It also involves an important right. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
, 252 F.3d 781, 786 (5th Cir. 2001))). [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:23 am
" Smith v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:09 pm
"New York appellate court upholds Atlantic Yards taking - Goldstein v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 12:34 am
In ABC v McBride [2001] NSWCA 322, the New South Wales Court of Appeal held that a defendant may rely on directly relevant facts – which in other circumstances might have been ingredients of a defence of justification – as mitigation of damages. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Smith v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Which consists entirely of Judges Bybee and Milan Smith. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:20 pm
Bush v. [read post]
