Search for: "People v. Snowden" Results 101 - 120 of 276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 7:00 am
On Friday, we will be in court with our co-counsel at the Knight First Amendment Institute and the law firm Cooley LLP for oral argument in the case, Wikimedia v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am by Graham Smith
The Snowden disclosures suggest that GCHQ has bulk intercepted and stored metadata by the tens of billions of records. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am by Graham Smith
The Snowden disclosures suggest that GCHQ has bulk intercepted and stored metadata by the tens of billions of records. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am by Graham Smith
The Snowden disclosures suggest that GCHQ has bulk intercepted and stored metadata by the tens of billions of records. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:44 pm by Cindy Cohn and Nadia Kayyali
” And in an amicus brief in EFF’s case First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. the NSA case, Sens. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm by Cindy Cohn and Nadia Kayyali
Ever since the Snowden revelations, honest (and some dishonest) efforts have been made in Congress to try to scale back at least some of the NSA’s spying. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
Documents provided by Edward Snowden and published in the Guardian and the Washington Post name nine U.S. companies—Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, and Apple—as participants in the NSA’s PRISM program. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:15 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
The United Kingdom, was brought in the wake of disclosures by whistleblower Edward Snowden, who confirmed that the NSA and GCHQ were routinely spying on hundreds of millions of innocent people around the globe. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Dunkins (EFF) New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional (EFF) EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment (Ongoing case of People v Dawes in SF Superior Court re geofence warrants)  People v. [read post]