Search for: "People v. Snyder" Results 241 - 260 of 465
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2011, 8:22 am by Eugene Volokh
Thanks to Ben Snyder for the pointer.UPDATE: Forgot to mention — the less unusual restriction (in the last paragraph) on “assemblies or demonstrations” in BART stations is also constitutional, see ISKCON v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:02 am by James Bickford
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes offers “a reminder of the real people behind the court’s cases” with a profile of Jason Pepper, the petitioner in Pepper v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by SHG
Snyder before Judge Stephen J. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
Snyder, who scheduled a pre-trial conference for August 18, 2014. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
” According to the union, the judge “accused Snyder and Orr of using bankruptcy as a backdoor around the state constitutional protection of pension benefits. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm by Karwan Eskerie
He pointed to the very liberal approach taken by the US Supreme Court to controversial messages, as exemplified in its recent decision in Snyder v Phelps et al 562 U.S. (2011) (a case concerning homophobic picketing outside military funerals by a church group who wanted to communicate their belief that God hated the US for its tolerance of homosexuality in the American military). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
Snyder, where the Supreme Court will decide two questions: (1) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex? [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
Snyder, where the Supreme Court will decide two questions: (1) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex? [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am by Amy Howe
Here is the full schedule Snyder v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Rather, in each case the court must undertake an analysis that centers on the authority under which the entity was created, the power distribution or sharing model under which it exists, the nature of its role, the power it possesses and under which it purports to act, and a realistic appraisal of its functional relationship to affected parties and constituencies' (Matter of Smith v City Univ. of NY, 92 NY2d 707, 713 [1999])" (Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; see Snyder v… [read post]