Search for: "People v. Sosa"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
Generations of people in the community were poisoned by lead, arsenic and other toxic substances, resulting in a devastating array of physical and mental illnesses and in some cases, death. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:57 am
In Baker v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:49 pm
See David Sosa v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
Also, David Sosa.] [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Sosa-Campana, 167 A.D.3d 464, 89 N.Y.S.3d 75, (N.Y. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:13 am
” Scalia repeatedly warned about the application of international law as precedent in U.S. cases, including in his concurring opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Now contrast this opinion with a less famous, but in my view, more interesting case (jurisprudentially, not substantively): Sosa v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
In Doe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 4:46 pm
Corporate accountability dodged another bullet as it appears that a majority of the Court agreed that federal courts may continue to recognize under certain circumstances, as the Court addressed in Sosa v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Supreme Court in Nestlé v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:47 pm
It instead elected to obtain this information in two parts; first, by asking for the numerator (the number of people who got loans), and then (presumably) asking for the more discrete denominator (the number of people who applied for them -- as opposed to the number of people who got letters, which we already know) later. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:36 pm
In Sosa v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:36 pm
In Sosa v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 5:02 am
The most famous example, I think, is Chicago v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 10:23 am
” In a July 25, 2018 decision, United States v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:55 pm
Sosa v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Five years ago, in Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 10:55 am
Sosa v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm
Ahmed v. [read post]