Search for: "People v. Souter"
Results 1 - 20
of 458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2009, 9:46 am
Justice Souter has been a more consistent liberal voice, much more in the mold of Justice Ginsburg or Justice Stevens (ie.Arizona v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 9:54 am
As a former Souter clerk, here's a take on Justice Souter's legacy. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:00 pm
The point is perhaps clearest in his concurrence in the judgment in Washington v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:38 am
Just a few weeks ago, the Court decided in Arizona v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 11:29 am
A classic Souter concurrence reads: "I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:03 pm
You see, not all Republicans are bad people. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 7:08 am
Souter’s second example is The Supreme Court’s decision in 1954 in Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:14 pm
The number of people who have the horsepower and reputation to truly deserve a Supreme Court appointment is pretty small. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:13 pm
We’d like to believe that people of Souter’s stature in the debate not only know what they think, but understand why they think it. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
Those are the words of Justice David Souter, writing for the four dissenters in The Supreme Court's decision Thursday in Bowles v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
Security in people's houses. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:29 am
Casey, Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter saved the landmark abortion precedent to ensure that people would not view the Court as a political institution. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm
Because Justice Souter is such a mensch, the perspective that he brought to the issue we discussed is likely shared even by many good people today. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:30 am
by suggesting that it would have led the Supreme Court in 1954 not to its Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:19 am
(Once again, I suggest a new motto for special education: special education - bringing people together.) [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:45 am
It may be politically useful that her opinion isn't known, and yet that may mean that she'll turn out to be a surprise (as Souter, the man she's replacing was in his time).None of the cases in Judge Sotomayor's record dealt directly with the legal theory underlying Roe v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 12:19 pm
National Public Radio speculated that Dean Nora V. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:35 am
Even though SCOTUSblog will competently cover Snyder v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:54 am
The case is Ali v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 5:31 am
Especially after she heard this, from one of her tipsters:Attended oral arguments at SCOTUS [last week] in Gross v. [read post]
