Search for: "People v. Spaniel"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
It is clear after Matal v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:04 pm
Especially for people cooped up in their houses all day with their pets. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:50 am
Seuss Enters., L.P. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
VIP Products LLC, a dispute involving a “Bad Spaniels” dog toy parody of Jack Daniel’s brand of whisky. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Rogers v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:05 pm
New York v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Another pending case is Novak v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:12 am
The ruling in question happened in a case called Tracy v Solesky. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which held that the toy was protected under the reasoning of Rogers v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:37 pm
In Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Cooper, in his November 29, 2013 opinion in Travis v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
John v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
The 9th Circuit in Bosley v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
” (Reference is to the use of Bad Spaniels as a mark for dog toys). [read post]
