Search for: "People v. Spellings"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,018
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 11:56 am
When even I -- someone who's never smoked a cigarette in his life -- knows that it's actually spelled "Marlboro".We in the United States kill ourselves with products spelled differently than their British origins, thank you very much. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 1:16 pm
People v Hicks, 68 NY2d 234, 241). [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 1:01 pm
Spell check won't catch that one. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
Bill describes the unlikely chain of events that led him to Hoffmann (who spells his name with two "n's" ... the Wisconsin Supreme Court is responsible for the altered spelling) in footnote 9 of his new article about the case, Hoffman v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm
Before today, the police were generally only authorized to do those things that were actually spelled out in the court's warrant. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:33 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 2:01 pm
(Sah v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:47 am
In 2008, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled, in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Spell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
That's a lot of m*****f***ing.First there was People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:52 am
That's because the people that publish e-books want that other person to pay to download their own copy. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:49 pm
(The opinion contains 27 pages.)But the parties care, some random other people care, and it's a federal appeal, so Judge Ikuta spells it all out for anyone interested.At least now, when someone asks you what sorts of appeals the Ninth Circuit hears, you can say: "Well, orders of the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:17 am
In November, it will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:28 pm
See all those clubs hit other people? [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided the case of Utah v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 9:44 pm
Normally, I expect people to use the alternate spelling ("acquiror") when discussing Delaware corporate law, even though "acquirer" is viewed in some circles as the proper form. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:50 am
For those who are interested, the seminal case is Little v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Castellano, 41 AD3d 184, 185; People v Carter, 40 AD3d 1310, 1312). [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:50 pm
")But even I know that the relevant provider is spelled "Nextel", not "Nextell". [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
Yeah, at some level, that's interesting, to some people at least. [read post]
