Search for: "People v. Stone" Results 321 - 340 of 1,231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2020, 8:37 am by Verena von Bomhard
  The General Court denies likelihood of confusion, contrary to EUIPO In one of its last decisions in the old year (judgment of 19 December 2019, T-40/19, Amigüitos pets & live v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm by Evelyn Douek
It is unclear why these time limits should be set in stone, and, indeed, this could be a matter on which the board itself might amend the bylaws in the future. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); another based on Cuyler v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:56 pm
("Want some stone crabs from Joes for lunch? [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm by JD Hull
To name a few famous people who've been so accused: Pablo Picasso, Eva Peron, Warren Beatty, Sharon Stone, Charlie Chaplin, Margaret Thatcher, Christian Barnard, Donald Trump and William Shatner. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Peter S. Margulies
A similar dynamic has occurred following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
We also discuss implications for informed decision-making by the Marshallese and local atoll governments and their people on issues pertaining to island resettlement. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Schwartz challenges McCulloch’scanonical status a foundation stone in the building of American constitutional law. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The test to be applied to national security cases is, as Stone points out, the Pentagon Papers version of the clear and present danger test (per Stewart “direct, immediate and irreparable damage to our Nation or its people”). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:08 am by Chris Castle
“We never get accustomed to being less important to other people than they are to us. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Stone has long cultivated a public image as a dirty trickster on the edges of mainstream politics. [read post]