Search for: "People v. Suite (1980)" Results 21 - 40 of 395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs faced with the prospect of these harms might choose not to litigate: People who were sexually assaulted, for instance, might be reluctant to continue with their lawsuits once pseudonymity is denied; likewise for people who have been libeled, or who have been pretextually fired by their employers. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
   (Nixon, being Nixon, fought back, filing suit the day after President Ford signed the legislation. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:31 am by Will Baude
But one other interesting thing about it is that it reaffirmed the validity of a 1980 case called Maine v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That was not intended to express disdain; rather, it had become quite clear that judges in general had little demonstrated interest in legal scholarship as it was developing in the 1980s and thereafter, when traditional doctrinal analysis was becoming subordinated to more self-consciously “theoretical” concerns. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
” Not only do people enter with full knowledge but there is no charge. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am by Anna Bower
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Patton v. [read post]