Search for: "People v. Summers" Results 161 - 180 of 2,620
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
Southern Command redacted scans of artwork created by people detained at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm by Gary Corn, Melanie Teplinsky
Entitled “Combating Ransomware: One Year On,” the paper was drafted in consultation with leading experts in the field: V. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
., the plausibility requirement for complaints under Iqbal v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm by Jonathan Movroydis
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the US Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Tom Kosakowski
Facilitator's will divide people into groups, pick a topic then brainstorm and discuss ideas. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:00 pm by A. Robert Quirk, Muhammad U. Faridi
  Not if it fails to provide objective criteria for a court to enforce material terms, according to the Albany County Commercial Division’s decision in Media Logic USA, LLC v. [read post]
Photo by ThisIsEngineering from PexelsBy: Enny Olaleye Last summer, The United States was rocked by the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:27 am by Emma Snell
  Yearslong lax internal procedures at the Supreme Court could have led to the leak of the draft opinion reversing Roe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by David Super
       Last summer, the Center for Media and Democracy surveyedstate laws on how the delegates to an Article V convention would be selected. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:54 am by Chris Dreyer
Among practicing lawyers, only 14% are people of color. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:02 pm by Jennifer Lynch
In two amicus briefs just filed in appellate courts, we argue that’s a clearly unconstitutional search.[1] The two cases are People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]