Search for: "People v. Super. Ct." Results 1 - 20 of 418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
The people who wrote Prop. 21 knew full well how to lock in the existing statutory definitions when that's what they intended. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 11:37 am
"Which is, I guess, theoretically true -- once the California Supreme Court decides something, barring its reconsideration of this issue, the only thing left is to ask the Legislature to change the law.But I'm fairly sure that the class of people who drive drunk and kill people don't exactly have awesome lobbyists in the California Legislature. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm
Now, all those 213 people don't have an election to run in, and their terms automatically expire. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 3:35 pm
Nonetheless, a notice of appeal is super easy to prepare and file. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
They're concerned that the guy they're looking for might be hiding behind one of these doors, so just like in the movies, they're super careful when they start opening each of the doors. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
They'll be super cheap, since they provide basically no coverage, but I'll nonetheless issue proof of insurance forms that you can show to the cops if they pull you over and ask for proof of insurance. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs faced with the prospect of these harms might choose not to litigate: People who were sexually assaulted, for instance, might be reluctant to continue with their lawsuits once pseudonymity is denied; likewise for people who have been libeled, or who have been pretextually fired by their employers. [read post]