Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Baker" Results 21 - 40 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
Waitangi Day protest, 2006 (Photo by Flickr user Charlie Brewer, Feb. 6, 2006, used under Creative Commons License 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). 1901: In Nireaha Tamaki v Baker, the Privy Council in London ruled that the courts did have jurisdiction to determine whether the land in dispute had been ceded to the Crown, in contrast to the approach that the New Zealand courts had taken since the Wi Parata case. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
Baker, 15-457, which asks whether a federal appeals court has jurisdiction to review an order denying a class certification after the named plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss their individual claims with prejudice; McDonnell v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
” Ben applied for Estonian e-residency after the Economist’s Edward Lucas asserted the superiority of Estonia’s cybersecurity during the third Hoover Book Soiree. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 5:55 am by SHG
Has enough time passed since the joy of Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Douglas, 2015 ONSC 1104 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded general damages of Can$30,000 to the individual plaintiff in respect of five postings on a bulletin board which were accessed 742 times. [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:24 am
The first Canadian charged and convicted under Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act was handed a three-year jail sentence Friday.Nazir Karigar, 67, appeared in an Ottawa court Friday and was sentenced by Ontario Superior Court Justice Charles Hackland. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:15 am by Terry Hart
Challenge to streaming TV — Lyle Denniston of SCOTUSBlog reports on the cert petition filed by TV broadcasters asking the Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit’s decision in WNET v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:15 pm
The affidavit of a child can occasionally be helpful to your client’s case; as the court put it in L.E.G. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400, 407 (Fla. 1996), for the proposition that the amended complaint raises only nonjusticiable “political” questions, see Baker v. [read post]