Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Brown)" Results 21 - 40 of 318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The “governed”—the American people (“We the people”)—accept the system and process. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he court shall assign each spouse’s non-marital property to that spouse. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Professor Adrian Vermeule agrees with the 1920 progressive consensus that courts should not interfere when legislatures adopt policies that reasonable people think pursue the public good. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
31 May 2022, 2:18 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
 In April 2020, the superior court rejected a challenge to the New Jersey EOLOA. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
  From 1795 through 1934, Congress regularly sanctioned people who defied its authority, and many Supreme Court decisions recognized its “inherent” power to do so. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
  Objectively speaking, natural law, as a term of politics and jurisprudence, may be defined as a loosely knit body of rules of action prescribed by an authority superior to the state. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
And he was surely correct in understanding that the equal protection clause must mean that one race never can be superior or subordinate to another. [read post]