Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Marks) (1991)"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
By Mark P. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Superior Court, 35 Cal. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
(quotation marks omitted). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
At trial, plaintiff alleged that the City was liable under a respondeat superior theory for Miller's negligence in shooting plaintiff and for the police department's negligence in planning the raid. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
At trial, plaintiff alleged that the City was liable under a respondeat superior theory for Miller's negligence in shooting plaintiff and for the police department's negligence in planning the raid. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066 (11th Cir. 1991). [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1351 n.2 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Superior Court, 231 P.2d 26, 28 (Cal. 1951) ("if there had been a physician patient relationship, the privilege would be waived. . . by [plaintiff's] bringing the action for personal injuries").The Weiss court determined that, since neither the state legislature nor the state courts had seen fit to create a physician/patient privilege, it was not the job of a federal court, sitting in diversity, to change state law. 2007 WL 2137782, at *2… [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
App. 1991). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
App. 1991). [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm
Pharmacy Bd. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Monagan (1988, pp. 170), Sheldon Novick (1989, pp. 522), Liva Baker (1991, pp. 783), G. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
