Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Marks) (1991)"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Argued October 12, 1993 -- Decided May 26, 1994On certification to the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County.Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Robert W. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:56 pm
Super Ct. 2000), and it is an unreported superior court decision from Connecticut. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEYAPPELLATE DIVISIONDOCKET NO. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Byrnes, The Supreme Court [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
Mendoza, 722 F.2d 96, 97 n.1 (5th Cir. 1983).7 We agree with the majority of the Courts of Appeals that have addressed this issue and find that by failing to raise the issue of standing in the Superior Court, the People have waived the issue on appeal. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Henderson of the Superior Court of Justice dated July 6, 2010, with reasons reported at (2010), 76 C.C.L.T. (3d) 92. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
The Superior Court rejected each of the plaintiff’s theories. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Superior Court, 35 Cal. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
By Mark P. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm
Pharmacy Bd. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Haslip, 499 U.S. 1, 18-19 (1991). [read post]
